Wednesday, December 17, 2008

How to curb another Blagojevich type incident

What needs to happen is, when you run for the presidency, you must vacate your senate/house seat, you aren't representing your constituents anyway at that point. The only exception would be if your term expires before the next job starts, but you may not run for both your old seat and the presidency.

The Vice Presidential selection must also vacate their seat if the term ends the following year (like Joe Biden this year, he won his seat and the vice presidency, now the Governor will select his replacement for the next 2 years).

This will fix several issues:

1) If you are running for an office you aren’t doing the job you were elected for.

2) It gives the people control of who will represent them.

3) It will prevent seat selling buy people like the Illinois Governor, since the people will be given the power to elect who they want.


Tuesday, June 12, 2007

It's all about the $$$


At a meeting tonight there was a discussion about a flurry of construction activity concerning noise mitigation in the neighborhoods around the airport.

It was apparent to everyone there that the new contractors were trying to get as much done to get their contracts filled before the new contract was to be negotiated in September. The reason is the people doing the sound abatement will receive more money in administrative fees if they do work on houses than if the houses are bought out. It was also discussed that there is less work being done on the houses (just storm doors and windows), for about the same amount of money that Cinnabar received.

Unfortunately what some of the home owners who accepted the sound abatement program didnt know was that the federal Gov't has equity in their house, so if $45,000 was put into the house by the feds, $45,000 will be taken out of the final price when the airport eventually buys out the house.


Thursday, January 11, 2007

Breaking her word...

Next Tuesday, Layman Van Acres was going to have a neighborhood meeting, but this wasn’t just any meeting, the mayor was scheduled to be there to hear their concerns on the Airport, the Noise Mitigation Program, Spartan’s expansion and the remainder of "the field".

That meeting has been cancelled. The mayor is going to the Roy Clark Tribute instead. Never mind she knew about the tribute before she agreed to appear, in fact she told Councilor Turner that she can attend both... back in December. So people of the neighborhood went door to door to let people know of this important meeting for no reason, I guess they just don’t have enough money to bend the mayor's ear.

Friday, September 01, 2006

Could it happen here?

By now, all of us should have heard about the crash in Kentucky where 49 people died because the airplane took off from the wrong runway. Even though FAA policy is that a minimum of two people be in the tower, there was only one, and he was operating on only two hours of sleep.

Would another set of eye prevented this fatal blunder?

Aparently Lexington isnt the only airport with this problem, four more are on the list. Do you want to make a  "wild" guess as to the location of one of those airports?
 

Thursday, August 31, 2006

A Tale of two Neighborhoods

The first is Brady Heights, a formerly rundown area of town where houses bought for less that 60k a few years ago are now fetching upwards of 250k, thanks partially to the local government & good ol’ boys involvement in propping up a downtown that has been dying for a very long time, mostly thanks to their inaction and piss poor planning in the first place.

The second neighborhood is Layman Van Acres, a formerly secluded neighborhood, who has watched their property values decline thanks to the city and its entity, the airport, either through ignoring the cries for help, or through outright deception. Thankfully we have members of the city council who are working to fix this problem created by former city councilors, mayors and airport directors.

Why should one neighborhood benefit from the government force-feeding our tax dollars downtown, and the other be utterly destroyed thanks to the same government’s turning a blind eye to the airport’s actions?
 

Monday, August 28, 2006

Airport noise update

the noise information provided by Boeing Company about Tulsa Internation Airport has been updated... here are my comments on the previous report

Considering the situation at Layman Van Acres I am not suprised by this entry:

Airport Noise Contour Overlay Maps - Unknown

Those maps tell a story about how a certain neighborhood is being repeatedly denied proper treatment by the TIA...

Thursday, August 24, 2006

Liotta Calls for Appointment of Airport Neighbor

For Immediate Release 8-23-06
Contact: Rep. Mark Liotta 918-836-7806

Liotta Calls for Appointment of Airport Neighbor

State Rep. says area resident will bring unique perspective

(Tulsa) - State Representative Mark Liotta called on Tulsa Mayor Kathy Taylor to appoint an airport area neighbor to the Board of Trustees of the Tulsa Airport Authority. “Mayor Taylor has an opportunity to appoint to the Board, someone who actually lives within the traffic and sound footprint of the airport”, said Liotta. “This would be a great first step toward ensuring that all parts of Tulsa are given a voice.”

“The board could only benefit from the perspective of an individual who understands the local effects of the airport on a daily basis.” he said. "Among the many active neighborhood leaders who are also airport area residents, there should be no problem finding someone willing and uniquely able to serve their community."

The position became available when current member Brigadier General Ron Turner asked that his name be removed from consideration. General Turner had served on the board since 2002.

Liotta continued, “This individual would be keenly aware of the concerns of Tulsans who live within a mile radius of the airport, including neighborhood cohesion, street traffic patterns, industrial and commercial development, as well as airport noise abatement.”

Rep. Liotta suggested that relations between the airport and its neighbors could be improved, “The best way to maintain good neighbors is by maintaining communication, and putting a neighbor on the board can certainly improve communication. This should have been a requirement for at least one of the board positions when the board was originally developed.”

Representative Liotta’s House district encompasses the entire Tulsa International Airport and all the surrounding neighborhoods. Liotta has served in the House since 1996.

-30-

Monday, June 26, 2006

More houses being bought out...

but not in Tulsa...


Saturday, June 24, 2006

A few Layman Van Acres notes (updated)

This is a followup to a story I posted back in May concerning exploding water faucets in Layman Van Acres. Apparently they have turned up the water pressure from a nominal 55lbs to over 100lbs to accommodate Spartans new dorms, thus putting the older (and in my case not so old) residential plumbing at risk. As usual Roscoe Turner end up having to fight for the neighbor hood as complaints fall on deaf ears.

City council public works meeting 6/20/06:  "Discussion of water pressure in and around the area of Pine and 89th E. Avenue including Layman Acres, Van Acres, Spartan School of Aeronautics dormitories and apartments, and proposed industrial area. (Turner) [PW 6/6/06] 06-813-1"

other things going on. a resolution went through the senate (SR 121, Randy Brogdon) to encourage the city council to vote for their resolution supporting a buyout, and there is a measure in the works (Mark Liotta) for the state house. David Schuttler wrote about Spartan moving some engine testing bays when they move to the field next to the neighborhood, he says they must be bought out, but didnt elaborate... my guess is that they will be quickly forced into the 70+db contour with all that racket going on over there, which then there will be no choice but to buy them out!

Be sure to check out the next Urban Tulsa as well for an article concerning the plight of this neighborhood

Wednesday, May 31, 2006

Are they trying to flood the neighborhood out?

For the second time in 4 months my house in Layman Van Acres had its kitchen faucet blow up. The first time it happened I thought it was just a freak accident until I talked with my neighbor, hers blew up as well. Over the weekend the new faucet blew up as well. I had heard that we weren't the only ones with exploding faucets.

So why is the the city playing with the water pressure in this area (someone measured it at over 100psi)?

Tuesday, May 23, 2006

8 years down, 8 to go?

In 1998, residents residing in 519 buildings in Manchester Square, a subdivision near LAX in the 65db contour, were part of a buy out. These buildings consisted of both homes and apartments. The FAA and LAX are finishing up the program after some delays (they said it would take 3 years)

This part of this article sounds very familiar, with a different result. LAX listened to the residents:

“The airport agency, Los Angeles World Airports, approached the residents of Manchester Square in the late-1990s with an offer. It would spend some of the money it collects from passenger ticket fees to insulate their homes against the roar of the jets.

A group of neighbors had another idea. Their small community had begun to break down, as the apartment houses crowded in and addicts came looking for drugs. Every once in a while, the pop of gunfire would shatter the quiet of the night. Why, they asked, doesn't the airport just buy the homes outright?”

Roscoe Turner has asked for a resolution to be placed on the city council’s agenda for this Thursday. I agree with the councilor, this has been going on for too long, its time to start. The residents know changes wont happen overnight, but if the program had been done right from the beginning, like LAX, they would be done now.

Tuesday, May 16, 2006

An expensive lesson

Picher, Oklahoma is well on its way to becoming a ghost town with the government buying them out because of the lead and other contaminates in the soil and water. It will cost 80 million to by them out, yet the government has already spent 150 million trying to clean up the mess...

The resident of Layman Van Acres are in the same boat, but for some reason (we are guessing to try and get the property for next to nothing, or to double dip) the airport is doing everything within its power to not buy out the neighborhood, either with obviously flawed noise contour maps, or by not presenting the buyout option to the FAA in the first place.

How much more will the Airport waste before these people are properly compensated?
 

Saturday, May 13, 2006

Layman Van Acres in the News... Again

Thanks to Spartan School of Aeronautics' plan to make the agricultural field to the west of Layman Van Acres its campus, Roscoe Turner offered up at the city council meeting (then withdrew) a resolution to buy out the residents of Layman Van Acres. It was withdrawn because he said Mayor Taylor was receptive to the idea and would like to study it.

What I fail to see is the reasoning for the dragging of feet. The city would lose no money in the transaction. According to FAA guidelines, the buyout price would include buying the house at fair market value if the house was located in an area not affected buy the airport, paying for the resident to relocate to a new house, which would include closing costs, points (if applicable) and moving expenses... the high estimate on all those costs combined is $100,000 per home. of that the city is responsible for 5% of that, or $5000 per home. Here is where the city will get its money back, plus some. The houses can be sold to be moved off of their lots, those houses usually sell for a minimum of $5000 each, usually more. now with an area cleared for development, access to I-244, I-44, Hwy 169, the airport and a straight shot to the Port of Catoosa, the airport could lease or sell the land out to Industry.

With these developments the residents of Layman Van Acres are cautiously optimistic

Thursday, February 02, 2006

none...none...none...

...and unknown

from: http://www.boeing.com/commercial/noise/tulsa.html

Noise Budget Restrictions - NONE (we keep hearing from our so-called leaders in Washington they are doing all they can... nope, doesnt look like it to me)
Noise Surcharge - NONE
Noise Monitoring System - NONE (Dont want the public to know how bad it really is up there)
Noise Level Limits - NONE
Sound Insulation (Residences and Public Buildings)  - unknown (formerly run by Cinnebar, now stalled)
Purchase Assurance for Homeowners Located Within the Airport Noise Contours - unknown (they've been saying they are going to take care of Layman Van Acres for over 20 years, but no assurances)
Airport Noise Contour Overlay Maps - unknown (its amazing how the noise stops at 87th E Ave...)


Monday, January 02, 2006

Land For Sale!

Milton O. Carlin has some land for sale, that he would like to sell to the airport. This land is needed for the airport to put in its 3rd runway, to the east of Mingo. The airport has no business buying land for expansion until Layman Van Acres is taken care of!

Though they say that air-traffic hasn’t reached the levels of the late 80s, the type of aircraft, specifically the F-16s, have increased their presence, with more on the way, thanks to some regional base closings. 

Though I have moved out of the neighborhood, I want what’s best for my friends and former neighbors, and it is amazing how a little time away can sharpen your perspective of the situation.

What Im truly concerned about with the F-16s touch-and-go maneuvers over the neighborhood is a crash

 

Wednesday, December 28, 2005

Oh this is rich!

NOISE plan contractor sues TAIT
Tulsa World (subscription) - Tulsa,OK,USA
... inception in 2000 through July. Cinnabar sound insulated 492 homes in neighborhoods mostly south of Tulsa International Airport. ...


unfortunatly, this is all I have, but it doesnt take much to read between the lines

Sunday, November 20, 2005

Living in Limbo

David Schuttler has dug up some older Whirled articles concerning airport noise which indicates the Layman Van Acres neighborhood and a few others  are "located in areas where the noise level is not recommended for residential areas, according to federal land-use guidlines." I dont know about you, but if the feds say they arent recommended for residential use, why are there still houses there?

what I found interesting was this little article from 11-20-1996...

"Residents who are affected by airport noise should not be left in limbo indefinitally, wondering if or when something will change"

Layman Van Acres has been in limbo for a long time, longer even than 1996, and from all appearances the airport has no intentions of changing the way things are done to fix the problems. The airport just re-hired the same consultant (Barnard Dunkelberg) that performed the sound tests in the 90s. Eye-witness accounts say that the tests were skewed by purposely placing sensors where they would capture less sound (between houses, under trees, etc.).

 

Friday, November 18, 2005

Airport Noise Program to Reopen in January

The noise abatement program on 194 houses restarts January 1 by C&S,  Meanwhile Cinnabar is going to sue the airport for the $700,000, cause they think they deserve to be paid for the pathetic excuse they called "work" that they did on houses near the airport. Again, only soundproofing, air easement purchase, or sales assist are offered.

 

Monday, October 31, 2005

Buy 'em up, Move 'em out, Build it up...

...And The property won't stay empty long!

Some examples from this article

AirWorks, a division of a Los Angeles-based security firm that modifies aircraft in an 80,000-square-foot hangar it opened last week on the west side of Tulsa International, already is looking for a larger facility.

Expansion plans of the companies that employ 12,000 people at the airport, as well as those of the 200 Tulsa-area companies with which they do business, is creating a facilities gap.

"In the future, it's very probable that we'll need more space," said Don Carlisle, general manager of the Tulsa division (American Airlines). "There's a lot of new activity in the industry and a need for more planes."

However, as long as there are residents in Layman Van Acres, not only will they not have their property, but the airport wont be able to do anything with the previously purchased property between I-244, Highway 11, Pine & 89th E Ave (as witnessed by the proposed Gilcrease Distribution Center)

With the federal sound abatement program picking up 95% of the tab, why the TIA doesnt do the right thing and buy out the neighborhood boggles the mind. there would  be a three fold benefit:
  1. Residents who should be bought out will be removed, the FAA itself said the area should not be used for residential.
  2. The airport could then use the land to expand the airports industrial complex, expanding old and attracting new companies, which means more jobs and tax dollars to the city.
  3. It eliminates the waste that is going on in the area, instead of spending a rediculous amount of money soundproofing homes that by all acounts cannot be soundproofed, the airport can buy the houses and resell it to private industrial developers, thus recouping its money
Another entity that would benefit would be the real estate market in Tulsa, with an influx of people ready to buy new houses (well new to them anyway).

Wednesday, October 26, 2005

Let my people go!

The Layman Van Acres Neighborhood held a meeting concerning the airport noise last night. Overall I left with a favorable impression that something might finally be done. To be honest, I am a newcomer to the neighborhood, only have lived there for 8 years. Residents got up and pleaded their case to Charles Sublet, Carl Clay & Roscoe Turner; they started by stating their name and how long they have lived in the neighborhood. Dates like 1954, 1960, and 1968 were common in a crowd that filled the little church on north Mingo. Yes I’m a newcomer, but my neighbors who have been here far longer deserve to be treated fairly, and being that the fair thing to do is to buy them out.

It is unclear what the airports motivations are concerning the neighborhood. In noise contour maps presented at the meeting, it seems great effort is made to show that we are not affected by the noise. When former airport director Brent Kitchen was confronted by residents of Layman Van Acres about the problem, he stated “We have complaints about the airport from South Tulsa residents all the time”. Apparently he didn’t even bother to do his homework.

In a survey conducted by then councilor Patrick there were three options, none of which included buyout. Those surveys where residents wrote in “buyout” were discarded. The neighborhood itself then did its own survey to be presented showing that 63% favored a buyout, but when the meeting rolled around to present those findings the neighbors were not allowed to speak. Shortly after that Cinnabar was hired.

3 months after I moved in a group of fed up neighbors decided they had enough and filed a lawsuit against the airport to be bought out instead of signing on with of Cinnabar's Home Quiet Home program, 1/3 of the neighborhood signed on. Others wanted on the lawsuit but couldn’t afford it, my wife and I were almost in that category at the time, but we were determined to make sure we weren’t left behind when the neighborhood was bought out. That was over 7 years ago, and we are still fighting. In that time many on the lawsuit died… they literally died fighting the airport.

In the last 8 years since the inception of the city’s noise abatement program, the neighborhood has seen rapid decline, this is not the neighborhood we bought into 8 years ago, and we are on one of the good streets. 

The people in the lawsuit, aren’t looking to get rich, they are looking to be removed from houses that are shaking apart thanks to the airport, they are looking to go someplace where they can hold conversations and enjoy their back yard, they are looking for what has been promised for 20+ years

As Councilor Turner has been quoting lately "Let my people go"

Thursday, October 20, 2005

I'm a little late to the party...

the Urban Tulsa has a good article concerning the airport, its nice to have a (another) newpaper that isnt afraid to shoot straight with the citizens of Tulsa.

David Schuttler & Michael Bates already have articles concerning the article, but there is one thing I found rather amuzing (in a pissed of sort of way) was that Mulder said:

"across-the-board buyouts weren’t reasonable--it would be too difficult to resell the homes, it would negatively impact the surrounding housing market, and it would cost more than the three options already offered to residents."

two things...
1) "it would be too difficult to resell the homes" why is that Mr. Mulder? Is it because of the Airport making too much noise?
2) " it would negatively impact the surrounding housing market" isnt that what you are doing with the seller assist? how does that not "negatively impact the surrounding housing market"?

Tuesday, October 18, 2005

Now we get to see if...

... their word means anything.

Last weeks city council meeting, item 8.
a. Resolution staying the approval of airport noise abatement contracts. (Turner) 05-1157-2.

because the airport agreed to meet with the residents concerning their needs this resolution was not voted on. on the 14th, the Airport Authority agreed to hire C&S to clean up Cinnabar's mess.

Call me a sceptic, but now there isnt any reason for the airport to work with the neighborhood or the council for another year, they got what they wanted... again...

There is hope however, David Schuttler has done the research and C&S is the best pick.

Thursday, October 13, 2005

Why does the city keep bailing out the TAA?

$300,000 for a runway that was never built thanks to a poorly written contract by airport attorney Richard Studenny.
$700,000 for advances to Cinnebar for an unsupervised sound abatement program (of which the money has probably been funneled to the south yale bridge).
$7,000,000 for an airport hanger thanks to a loan to now bankrupt Great Plains airlines.

Tuesday, September 20, 2005

FEMA + FAA = Layman Van Acres solution?

FEMA’s new director said they are looking for permanent housing for displaced New Orleans residents.

FAA says the houses in Layman Van Acres should be bought out, at least on a voluntary basis

Maybe FEMA & the FAA can work together to to buy out those that want out of the area, and provide an opportunity for those who have no home at all?

Win-win situation if you ask me…

Wednesday, August 31, 2005

Layman Van Acres vs. Tulsa airport round… errrr… I lost count

Also during the Public Works Committee meeting the subject of the noise abatement program and Layman Van Acres was on the agenda. Turner again came to bat for the neighborhood concerning why the buyout was never offered, that the FFA claims the neighborhood should have been bought out, and that the area should be industrial.

Chris Medlock chimed in asking why the city couldn’t buy out these properties. Jeff Mulder said that the airport would have to run another sound test, which thanks to quieter airplanes may disqualify some houses from the program (as what happened in Detroit), Chris then pointed out that if it was quieter, why sound abate those houses, save money, and take care of Layman Van Acres as a priority?

Several numbers were thrown around, specifically between a mandatory and a voluntary buyout. The Mandatory buyout would cost about $100,000 a house between acquisition, moving expenses and paying the difference between the appraised value of the old house and the new house (up to 20,000 IIRC). The voluntary buyout runs about 20-30k less, or about 70k per house… don’t forget… the airport was spending upwards of 50k per house on soundproofing houses in the area (the average home sales price has dropped to about $59,000)

Turner added that Minneapolis, MN & Harrisburg, PA are doing it (buyouts) so why cant this neighborhood be taken care of?

Chris also suggested that Layman Van Acres be taken care of before a new sound abatement contract is put into place.

Randy Sullivan also chimed in saying the airport should be as aggressive as it can be using the federal dollars and get it done (the city is on the hook for only 5% of the cost, the FAA picks up the rest.)

Mulder was asked to come back in two weeks to answer the 5 questions that were brought before him at an earlier date concerning LVA


Monday, August 08, 2005

Vision 2025 Neighborhood funding

In a neighborhood meeting tonight we were informed that a whopping 2 million dollars of Vision 2025 money will be available for Tulsa neighborhood improvements (the rest going to the Arena) several ideas were thrown out, like another unfilled pool, water for an existing pool and transforming tennis courts into basketball courts (I like that idea, I have NEVER seen those courts used for tennis, but we have all sorts of portable hoops lining our streets).

On suggestion really caught my attention though, Neighborhood Signage, you know those little signs on the back of stop signs so you know what neighborhood you are entering. to the left is my submission, I hope they like it!

Another small bit of airport news, Roscoe Turner has a memo stating that the FAA has a contract with the city, not with Cinnebar, so the city was never in any danger of losing its sound abatement money as so claimed by General Ron Turner and Meredith Siegfried.

Sunday, August 07, 2005

GTAR sides with Layman Van Acres on Buyout!

At least that’s what the fabricated headline should read. GTAR, the Greater Tulsa Association of Realtors, should be behind the voluntary buyout of the homes in the Layman Van Acres Neighborhood 110%… after all they were behind the recall of Mautino & Medlock, because they claimed the councilors were stifling regional growth (read: home sales). If the Airport was to buyout Layman Van Acres, they would have a whole neighborhood of people looking to BUY HOMES!!! Which puts money in the Association’s pockets…

so come on GTAR, where’s the support?

Wow... does this sound familier...

"I can't afford to sell it right now," Halderman says in her living room, which shakes as flights pass by every few minutes. "I live in a no-man's land - too close to the noise but not close enough to get help. And you can't tell me that it's any quieter here, less than a hundred feet from where they tore down the other houses. So I say buy me out. I'm not trying to make a killing."

from the article Airport neighbors barely miss buyout (April 21, 2004 The Cincinnati Enquirer)

BUT WAIT! There's More!!!

Cinnabar claimed the FAA had no money available for the buyout option... well IF they didn't, they do now!

100 families can flee airport noise (February 9, 2005 The Courier-Journal)


Thursday, August 04, 2005

Aftermath of the Cinnabar funding vote...

And yet another article concerning the fallout from the Tulsa airport trustees vote to nix Cinnabar. notice the figures involved $31,000 to "soundproof" the houses + $14,000 in administrative costs = $45,000 a house!!!

Also notice this bit here... "Federal noise mitigation programs began 20 years ago in Tulsa with property buyouts of homes affected by average aircraft noise levels of 70 decibels." That is what chopped my neighborhood in half, effectivly killing it... again TIA do the right thing, you said you would 20 years ago (Buy us out, using federal guidelines... and you know you will only have to foot 5-10% of the bill)

Wednesday, August 03, 2005

Airport noise program suspended (cont...)

Not a whole lot to talk about today, but here is an article concerning the Tulsa airport trustees vote to cut off Cinnabar's funding...

Sunday, July 31, 2005

No man is an Island, but my neighborhood is

I, Mad Okie, am a resident of the Layman VanAcres Neighborhood. To the north is the airport & the north/south runway, to the east is Mingo & industrial zoned land, to the south is I-244 which took a part of the neighborhood during construction, and to the west is Highway 11, which ate another chunk out of the neighborhood when the road was built, and a large empty field, that used to contain a portion of the original neighborhood bought out by the TIA/FAA because of noise levels.

About 7 years ago, the Tulsa airport got into bed with Cinnabar and offered up ~1400 homes one of three options, purchase of the easement which came to a fraction over $1000.00 (which protected the airport from ANY future lawsuits), sales assistance, and sound abatement, where they cram a bunch of “soundproofing” into houses built in the 1950s which has a lifespan of about 5 years (the only way to soundproof a structure is to do so at the time of construction). The only option missing is buy-out. Cinnabar & the airport both state that the FAA had no funds to purchase homes, yet the FAA claims to have never received the request in the first place and Roscoe Turner has requested that the TIA/Cinnabar provide the letter stating as much. To this date the letter has not materialized.

It is my opinion that the reason the buyout was not offered was so the airport could line their friends pockets on the FAA’s dime (the FAA covers between 90-95% of airport related sound abatement programs). The shoddy workmanship (as detailed here) further makes me believe that the TIA is looking to devalue the properties more so they can swoop in at a later date and buy up the properties they want at a) a lower price and b) using the FAA’s money.

As I stated earlier Cinnabar’s contract was not extended, and the TIA is now shopping around for someone else to take up the mantle. (as stated by this letter)

Now with Cinnabar out of the picture(?), what’s next? Will those west of Memorial be treated better with proper construction? With those in Layman VanAcres finally get what should have happened to them over 20 years ago? Unlike the south Yale bridge, F&M & Arvest banks bullying to get their way & the arena fiasco, the majority of the “island neighborhood” wants to be bought out. The area is ripe for industrial development with direct access to the airport, I-244, and 169 which give straight shots out to the Port of Catoosa, the BA & I-44.

TIA, we are asking you to do the right thing, you have promised for well over 20 years that Layman VanAcres would be taken care of… its time for you to take care of us.

Friday, July 29, 2005

30 Pieces of Silver

The airport special meeting concerning the 7 million dollar payout to Cinnabar for their sub par work on homes in the Layman Van Acre neighborhood and others in the airports flight path was held at 11:00 on Friday. This was a revote because of apparent conflicts with the previous vote (2-0). Because of the entity involved both members of the aforementioned  neighborhood and the “Move that Bridge” folks were out in force. Also in attendance was Councilors Henderson, Turner & Medlock. Falling on the side of the homeowners were Mr. Sublett, Mr. Clay & surprisingly Mayor LaFortune, via Chief LaCroix who apparently took General Turner by surprise when he said the mayor would be against giving Cinnabar more money.
Between this setback for Cinnabar & the 11 new F-16s that are going to be calling Tulsa home, those in attendance are hoping for is a re-evaluation of the noise mitigation program. The Tulsa Airport has promised the people in the Layman Van Acres neighborhood for the last 25 years they would take care of them, looks like they may be forced to now…