Reprinted from the Napa Valley Register
by DAWN CAPP
Tuesday, December 20, 2005 1:06 AM PST
This
holiday season is proving to be an unhappy one for dog owners. A new
law allows discrimination against breeds of dogs. Napa's Assemblywoman
Noreen Evans co-authored the bill in a misguided effort to target
dangerous dogs. Unfortunately, this legislation represents a step
backward toward heavy-handed government and legalized discrimination.
Rather than holding all dogs and owners equally accountable for their
actions, this bill discriminates against dogs that have the misfortune
of being born with the wrong looks. It makes no exceptions for service,
guide, therapy, search, working, or show dogs. It does not distinguish
between pure-bred dogs and dogs that look like they could be mixed with
the "wrong" breed. It will cause insurance companies to blacklist
breeds, forcing people to choose between their homes or their best
friend.
Many people believe this is "pit bull" law, but nowhere
do the words "pit bull" appear in the bill. The law allows counties to
decide which dogs people should own, show, or breed. It is not, nor
will it be, limited to pit bulls. In other areas that allow breed
discrimination, counties have restricted boxers, St. Bernards, Great
Danes, Dobermans, Chows, Akitas, Alaskan Malamutes, Siberian Huskies,
German Shepherds, and other breeds. Instead of actually targeting
dangerous dogs and pet overpopulation, this bill acts as a soft ban on
breeds and will force the senseless euthanization of thousands of
loving pets.
Those who think this is just a pit bull problem
should meet Ed Nelson of Sacramento. He owns a service dog, Ace. Ace
has never hurt anyone. However, when Ed tried to renew his insurance,
he was denied coverage because his dog was of the wrong breed. The
insurance company didn't care that Ace was a service dog, nor did it
care that, without Ace, Ed's life would be turned upside down, and it
would be hard for him even to leave his home. Ace is a German Shepherd.
Even
if SB 861 did just target pit bulls, it would still be wrong. No one
breed is inherently dangerous. A daschund ripped through a playpen and
killed the family's infant. A Chihuahua attacked a mail carrier,
causing a serious injury. Those type of attacks rarely make headlines
simply because they don't involve the words "pit bull."
Unfortunately,
pit bulls make news even when they don't actually attack. Various news
agencies reported a dog that killed a Detroit elderly woman to be
either a pit bull or pit bull mix. The Detroit Free Press, however,
identified the dog as a bull mastiff, complete with a graphic. ABC
Channel 7 news aired the story of a "pit bull" attack, and on the Web
version of the story writes, "One NYPD housing officer was attacked by
a pit bull." However, the dog was a rottweiler, and the station
admitted the "pit bull" label was an error (that, weeks later, remained
uncorrected on the Web site). Then there are cases of outright lies,
such as when a boy claimed he'd been attacked by a pit bull. The Green
Bay Press-Gazette reported the youngster later admitted the offending
canine was an acquaintance's German Shepherd.
Unfortunately, pit
bulls tend not to make news when they do good deeds. Few people are
aware that Stubby, America's earliest and most decorated war dog, was a
pit bull. Almost no one has heard about Dakota, a California pit bull
search dog that NASA invited to help search for remains of the Columbia
shuttle.
Hardly anyone knows that RCA, Alaska's first certified
hearing dog, was a pit bull. RCA's family dumped her when they couldn't
find housing that would accept a pit bull, and she went to the SPCA. At
the time, Alaskan veterinarian Dr. Joyce Murphy was starting a hearing
dog program. Murphy temperament-tested 170 dogs, and RCA scored the
highest, so Murphy chose her to be Alaska's first hearing dog.
Pit
bulls are no more dangerous than other dogs of their size. They do not,
contrary to myth, have locking jaws, nor can they bite with 2,500
pounds of pressure. The National Geographic did a study of bite force
in dogs, testing a rottweiler, German Shepherd, and pit bull. The pit
bull bit with the least amount of pressure, at approximately 320
pounds. Despite the facts showing that pit bulls are not substantially
different than other large dogs, legislators often quote these fake
statistics when advocating breed discrimination, ignoring both the
California Veterinary Medical Association and the American Veterinary
Medical Association. Both organizations officially oppose breed
specific legislation.
Dogs are among the most intelligent
species on this planet and deserve our respect. It is incumbent upon
humans to draft reasonable, effective laws to target irresponsible
owners and unethical breeders rather than discriminating against
innocent family pets simply because they were born with the wrong looks.